Title

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Thank you for smoking!!

For a movie which has such an incredulous title, ‘Thank you for smoking’ is almost in justification, rollickingly hilarious. It turns out to be a movie that almost extols the ‘gift of the gab’, a movie that brings such a nonchalant perspective to issues that trigger profoundly ethical discussions and are usually complicated unnecessarily, and a movie that seeks to light heartedly yet intelligently rationalize the means taken by different people to make their living or to put it as in the movie ‘to pay their mortgages’.

Nick Naylor(Aaron Eckhart) is a man who self admittedly makes money by talking. He is a lobbyist for the ridiculously named Academy of Tobacco studies, a consortium of tobacco manufacturers, where research is done solely with the capitalistic aim of disproving the health hazards of cigarettes. He smooth talks, oozes confidence, corners social activists, and helps keep the market for tobacco growing. The movie takes a tongue-in-cheek look at how governments make it incumbent upon themselves to parent cigarette smokers and make absurd regulations like the pointless statutory warning that accompanies ever cigarette label. In my opinion, government regulations against things like smoking and suicide are nothing but an intrusion into the privacy and personal preferences of people. Why do politicians and social activists try desperately to offer help to people who do not need any, and whose actions have a consequence on nobody but themselves. For instance, trying to police people on passive smoking, which harms others is a far more fruitful and sensible exercise than trying to educate fully aware people on the perils of smoking. I can go on in all earnestness and seriousness about this issue, but I would be doing immense injustice to the movie which makes no such attempts at taking stands, or defending the morality and ethics of people who work for the tobacco industry.

‘Thank you for smoking’ merely glazes the surface of deep issues, letting you draw conclusions, and in the true spirit of its message allows you to make for yourself the decision of what is right and what is wrong, or rather whether everything in life necessitates such a classification. There is sharp wit and wry humour in the dialogues and the scene where Nick engages his son in an argument which he proceeds to “win” by heading off in a totally tangential direction, had me chuckling to myself, for I have attempted to pull that on my friends many a time. And in a movie that was largely funny and pleasantly non-preachy, the end had two brilliantly directed moments- one where Nick is asked in the senate hearing whether he would let his son smoke when he turns 21 and the other where the almost reassuring fact that there are still many things in this world that money cannot buy, is subtly emphasized.

I had a great time watching this movie and I would rate it a must see. Go ahead and watch it and you wouldn’t regret it!

26 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

First movie at videsi land (theater)? :)

6:46 PM, June 16, 2006  
Blogger Dreamer said...

No da....5th or 6th I guess.....

6:52 PM, June 16, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi da...great post..can't wait to watch the movie now...might do so tonight come to think of it...

anyway...there was one thing that caught my attention considering the discussion on euthanasia we had recently...:)

glad to know you think suicide being illegal is bullshit too...:)

anyway...laters!!

9:14 PM, June 16, 2006  
Blogger shakuni said...

dreamer,
how's the internship man? santa clara is it?
quite a different movie really.
wonder how katie hung onto that hanger in nick's wardrobe.;)

1:54 AM, June 17, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

why u didnt call me...meanie

10:31 AM, June 17, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous=prem trying to be me!!

1:35 AM, June 18, 2006  
Blogger mucastic said...

Everything else has become in-the-face, nothing left to the imagination.Giving the viewer no room for participation.

Off-beat, is that the word they use? Their motto - Who is anyone to correct and pontificate?
But then who said its wrong to be a capitalist?! Free will.

The success of this film need not be its diplomacy alone.Could be its time of fit into a continously improvising genre?
And of course the fact that it has an audience that wants to be able to have control inside cinema halls as well!

Know what? I haven't seen a single movie you've mused about. I wish I could though.

12:46 AM, June 19, 2006  
Blogger Dreamer said...

Madhavi,
Thanks. Watch the movie!

Shakhuni,
Internship is as vetti as ever maan:)
Well as to the Katie hanging physics, I guess she was structurally supported at the foundation;)

Mucastic,
Its not so much as the audience wants control as much as the audience doesn't enjoy being controlled. This is not true in all cases when there are movies that hold you spellbound, are truly in-your-face, and just quell the need for you to think and interpret. There are others which are subtle, restrained, suggestive giving you the clay to mould how you see fit. They are two styles, at either end of the spectrum, both enjoyable in their own respects!

Get a DVD library membership! There is this place called Cinema Paradiso all over Chennai...I guess in Mumbai too:)
Speaking of which Cinema Paradiso is a great movie I have heard...Have it...yet to see it though:)

12:22 PM, June 19, 2006  
Blogger shakuni said...

dei
kamandalam vechundu irukkiravan pakkaththula ellam kanni ponnu ninnindu irukka!
nelama!

2:03 PM, June 24, 2006  
Blogger Dreamer said...

Shakuni,

Old Painting...Gender Confusion! The MAN in the background is Raja Raja Chozha. This is the only known portrait of his.

8:55 PM, June 24, 2006  
Blogger shakuni said...

wasn't he the fellow who popularised nataraja? and gopurams?

12:59 AM, June 25, 2006  
Blogger Dreamer said...

Well to put it mildly, Raja Raja Chozha is widely touted as one of the greatest kings to have ruled in India. As far as I know he dint popularise Nataraja or Gopurams. It is just that he was especially fond of Shiva in the Nataraja form and constructed many beautiful temples prominent among which is the Brihadeeswara temple at Tanjore. In fact this painting exists there.

6:51 PM, June 26, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Layout is far better now :) Maybe I can read again without feeling as if I took LSD :)

3:31 PM, June 27, 2006  
Blogger Dreamer said...

I just added a sidebar background. How does that change the layout? Are you really on LSD?

10:56 PM, June 27, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The text was ON the picture for quite sometime, making it unreadable :)

4:15 PM, June 28, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

found out that it some trouble with the browser actually :(

8:55 PM, June 28, 2006  
Blogger Rudra said...

to smoke or not to smoke.... is that the question?

i can't because my sinuses don't allow me to and i get a headache everytime i try. thank god for small favors!!!

the movie as u decribe it seems to be more about the journey than the destination...i like such movies.

I'll probably go and see it this weekend and we can swap notes.

and yeah....moral stands suck!

1:42 PM, June 29, 2006  
Blogger Dreamer said...

psrivats,

Well, I guess I see what you were talking about. I have a problem of the background repeating when I view the page elsewhere. I am too lazy to fix that:)

Rudra,
As always, you agree with something I never said:)
I said the movie din't take moral stands...I never said they suck! Moral stands are cool as long as they are stood by:)

Smoking gives you headaches, so you don't. Drinking gives you so much worse and yet you do!:)

4:51 PM, June 30, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the background picture makes it difficult to read the text. why dont u remove it?

5:18 AM, July 05, 2006  
Blogger Rudra said...

i have made a moral stand to drink, and i stand by it.

so, i am a morally 'cool' drinker.

cut out the smileys, dreamer. and spare me the effort of blocking out the image of your 'not so pearly whites' everytime i come to the end of one of your meticulously constructed sentences!!

3:23 PM, July 05, 2006  
Blogger Dreamer said...

swarna,

I think there are some browser settings which make the background encroach under the text. Will try and fix that in some time. It looks fine for me.

Rudra,
Well, first of all, all decisions are not moral stands. Please explain to me how your decision to drink constitutes a moral stand. I am lost!

Second, there was no connection between me saying moral stands are cool and talking about drinking and smoking. They were meant to be and are mutually exclusive.

Finally, frankly I dont see how a collen and a right bracket can even remotely evoke images of my "not so pearly" whites. If such a trivial trigger can set off such a strong visualisation in your head, you must be really obsessed with my smile in whcih case I guess the problem lies with you...not me!

9:01 PM, July 05, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shit, according to one of your replies RRC is the one in the background. does this picture depict him being G?

6:16 PM, July 06, 2006  
Blogger Subhashri said...

Is imsai arasan gng to be the next one in line??awesome choice though..

2:19 AM, July 10, 2006  
Blogger Dreamer said...

Sudarshan,
You just cannot think "straight"..Can you? Anyway there are no sexual connatations hidden in that painting. RRC stands behind his Guru as a mark of respect.Thats all. Sorry to disappoint you.

Bhooma,
Probably yeah. But I am too lazy...so I might not write one....

2:54 AM, July 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kaushik (not shit), just stfu ok. Art is open to interpretation and this is mine. When you say that RRC stands behind his Guru as a mark of respect, prove it, give me some references. If you would take a moment to look at the picture closely you will know why I asked you the question!

4:38 PM, July 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

At the beginning of the scene there was a medium long shot of the men digging by the grave. [url=http://www.mulberryhandbagssale.co.uk]Mulberry Tote Bags[/url] 4. [url=http://www.goosecoatsale.ca]canada goose women parka[/url] Ixhdnovvr
[url=http://www.pandorajewelryvip.co.uk]pandora jewellery[/url] Cvdfwafbf [url=http://www.officialcanadagooseparkae.com]canada goose jackets[/url] ljcrbevbb

9:24 PM, December 25, 2012  

Post a Comment

<< Home